The Most Powerful Company You’ve Never Heard of: Meet CME Group

HUFF POST  Chicago

Read the full article here.

By Elizabeth ParisianPolicy Analyst, Stand Up! Chicago

Think of powerful, multi-billion dollar corporations, and many come readily to mind. Wal-Mart. General Electric. Exxon Mobil. Bank of America. McDonald’s. Apple. We recognize their logos, know what they sell and how to buy it — or how to not buy it if we choose.

But for all their riches and ubiquity, when it comes to sheer raw power, these high-profile behemoths are eclipsed by a company that most of us have never heard of.

Meet CME Group. Last fall, Forbes revealed “The Four Companies That Control the 147 Companies That Own Everything,” in which contributor Brendan Coffey argues that “the real power to control the world” lies not with the likes of Wal-Mart and Bank of America, but with the select few companies that control the indexes that rank these corporations. CME Group, owner of the Dow Jones Indexes, is one of these four companies, which is why it is important for all of us to get to know this company, how it makes its billions, and how it impacts us all.

The “CME” in “CME Group” stands for the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, which has special significance for those of us who live in Chicago. We’re familiar with “The Merc” and the Chicago Board of Trade, the two iconic commodities futures exchanges comprising Chicago’s Wall Street. (And if you’re not from Chicago, you’ve likely seen the trading floor of Board of Trade — featured in the classic Ferris Bueller’s Day Off). CME Group formed relatively recently, when the Mercantile Exchange bought the Board of Trade in 2007. But a five-year growth and acquisition spree has secured its status as one of the four masters of the corporate universe.

So what does CME Group do, exactly? Maybe the word “derivative” rings a bell. Derivatives are the risky financial products (think credit default swaps) that brought the economy crashing down. The exchanges CME Group operates do handle a few respectable transactions — farmers protecting their commodities against price fluctuations for example. But mostly, these exchanges operate as giant casinos where thousands of ultra-wealthy traders and speculators go to place bets on the rise and fall of the price of commodities, including oil, gold, currencies, interest rates, and other exotic financial products.

 

Like more traditional casinos, CME Group makes its money by taking a cut of each and every bet. For a concise explanation of how derivative exchanges work, check out this clip from Trading Places, evidence that the whole set up is comically absurd. Unfortunately, in real life, it’s not an audience but the CME that’s laughing — all the way to the bank.

And the CME Group has a LOT to laugh about. A lot of money that is. Its profit margin is consistently above 30 percent, making it the most profitable company in Chicago and one of the most profitable companies in the world. It took home nearly $2 billion last year — a remarkable figure for a company with just 2,500 employees.

If you think that earning billions in profits year after year would be enough for CME Group, you’d be wrong. Tragically wrong. Because CME Group has a penchant for padding its already expansive bottom line with public dollars.

Chicagoans are familiar with the company’s $15 million TIF grab a few years back — and were justified in claiming victory when, after months of protest by community and labor groups, CME Group took the unprecedented step of giving the money back. And families across the state are now reeling from the Illinois General Assembly’s recent decision to reward CME Group’s empty threats to relocate with a tax loophole that will take $1 billion out of the state budget over the next ten years, resulting in layoffs and cuts to vital services.

CME Group has a funny way of “earning” money — and the joke is on the 99%. In addition to siphoning off taxpayer dollars that are desperately needed elsewhere, CME Group is also setting a very troubling example. By taking advantage of people’s fears about jobs and the economy to get its hands on public funds, it’s sending a message to all other corporations that they, too, can pad their profits, pay their executives multi-million dollar salaries, and hire corporate lobbyists to ensure that the laws continue to favor their company, all with our money.

Although keeping a low profile has helped CME Group become so powerful, over the last few months the company’s irresponsible behavior has earned it some unwanted attention. The collapse of its client MF Global, former New Jersey governor John Corzine’s derivatives brokerage where $1.6 billion in client funds went missing last October, put CME Group in the spotlight. The CFTC, the federal agency that oversees futures exchanges, is now investigating CME Group to determine whether the company fulfilled its regulatory obligation to safeguard customer money. And just a few days ago, CME Group announced that CEO Craig Donohue would be stepping down much sooner than anticipated, amidst growing trader dissatisfaction with his handling of the MF Global crisis.

Given both its immense power and its history of predatory behavior, we would be wise to keep an eye on CME Group. In the coming weeks and months, Illinois will be grappling with the giant hole that the company’s tax breaks have left in the state budget, and families will suffer as a result. There has never been a better time to stand up to this powerful company and demand that it give our money back.

Define “Extraordinary”

By George Goehl in Huffington Post to read the full article click here.

Last Monday, Charlotte, North Carolina’s city manager declared Bank of America’s annual shareholder meeting taking place this Wednesday an “extraordinary event.”

The extraordinary event tag refers to a city ordinance enacted in January in anticipation of the Democratic National Convention, to be held in Charlotte in September. The extension of the ordinance to cover the Bank of America meeting on May 9 gives law enforcement officials far-reaching power to limit protest and search protesters’ belongings. Possession of articles as mundane as a magic marker near the site of an extraordinary event can be grounds for arrest.

We ask, what is so extraordinary about people protesting a bank that has created so much havoc in the lives of so many? What seems extraordinary is Bank of America helping bring the economy to the brink of collapse. Extraordinary is receiving a $45 billion taxpayer-funded bailout and then lobbying to defeat reforms designed to prevent another crisis. Fraudulently foreclosing on families is behavior worthy of the label “extraordinary.”

We believe protest at the Bank of America meeting this year is not just normal — it’s the only response that makes sense. We don’t want to protest Bank of America’s shareholder meeting, but we have to, to protect our country from more unchecked corporate greed and abuse.

We want Bank of America to write down mortgages and keep families in their homes. We want Bank of America to provide good-quality and affordable loan products. We want Bank of America to stop providing financial backing to dirty energy, private prisons and predatory payday lending. We want Bank of America to pay its fair share of taxes.

Tagging the Bank of America shareholder meeting as an extraordinary event is another example of big corporations using their incredible economic and political might to silence the voice of Americans. On April 24 this practice was in clear view at the Wells Fargo annual shareholders meeting in San Francisco. More than 100 Wells Fargo shareholders were locked out of the bank’s annual meeting. Only a dozen or so shareholders not part of Wells Fargo’s rubber stamp team were allowed into the meeting. When shareholders who are members of National People’s Action attempted to speak on the issues of foreclosures and Wells Fargo’s financial backing of private prisons that lobby against immigration reform, Wells CEO John Stumpf quickly cut them off, saying it had been a great year for his bank. The police carried the shareholders off, one by one, and arrested them. If this is how Wells Fargo treats their own shareholders, one can only imagine how they feel about the rest of us.

Now Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan will follow in the footsteps of his colleague Stumpf, using an extreme provision to limit the rights of the same people that helped bail out his bank. There is only one appropriate response from us: to head to Charlotte May 9 and make the protests there an extraordinary event in terms of size and spirit.

Fill a van or a bus and head to Charlotte. Book your tickets to Charlotte. And don’t forget your Bank of America is Bad for America signs. But, make sure to leave your magic marker at home — unless you are ready to go to jail.

Follow George Goehl on Twitter: www.twitter.com/GeorgeGoehl

Tesoro: Respect for Oil Workers Rights is Unrefined

Tesoro: Respect for Oil Workers Rights is Unrefined

Tesoro operates six oil refineries and more than 1,200 gas stations in the United States.

In April 2010, a deadly explosion at Tesoro’s Anacortes refinery in Washington resulted in the deaths of seven employees. After investigating the explosion, state safety officials imposed a $2.4 million fine, the largest for worker safety violations in Washington state history. Regulators said the accident was preventable and resulted from willful violations of safety law. The plant has had a history of safety lapses, having been cited for 17 serious workplace safety violations in 2010.

Last year, Tesoro unilaterally reduced negotiated retirement and health care benefits during the term of an existing contract. The United Steelworkers union filed National Labor Relations Board charges, a hearing was held and a decision is pending. Workers at four of the company’s refineries where negotiations for a new contract are underway have authorized a strike if the issue of unilateral benefit changes remains unresolved.

In 2011, Tesoro reported $905 million in pre-tax profits and recorded $94 million in current taxes, giving the company an effective tax rate of just 10.3%.

Tesoro’s CEO Gregory Goff received total compensation of $8.8 million in 2011, according to the company’s proxy statement, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Scott Klinger is an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.

Verizon: Shortchanging America


Verizon Employees Strike for Fair Wages -- from our friends at CWA

Verizon: Shortchanging America


With lines and cell phone towers that shape the landscape of many communities across America, few corporations are as visible as Verizon. The firm provides local phone service to a quarter of the nation and wireless service to about 100 million Americans. Last year, Verizon’s sales totaled $106 billion, and it ranked No. 16 on the Fortune 500 list. And yet it pays almost no taxes.

Between 2008 and 2011, Verizon reported $19.8 billion in U.S. profits and yet claimed an IRS refund on its federal taxes of $758 million. This amounts to an effective tax rate of negative 3.8 percent, according to the non-profit organization Citizens for Tax Justice.

Astoundingly, Verizon also contributed very little to state treasuries to fund schools, police, and other local infrastructure. Between 2008 and 2010, Verizon paid just 2.6 percent of its profits in state income taxes, well under the 6.2 percent average state tax rate, according to another Citizens for Tax Justice report co-authored by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

This is because the company has aggressively pursued tax subsidies and actively protests property tax assessments of everything from buildings to telephone poles.

Over the last seven years, Verizon has also become one of the nation’s leading job destroyers, cutting nearly 40,000 jobs worldwide. The extremely profitable company has demanded that remaining employees accept cuts to their pensions and other benefits, prompting 45,000 unionized employees to strike last fall. The company has told workers the cuts are necessary to respond to the competitive pressures of the marketplace.

But apparently those pressures don’t extend to the corner suite. When Verizon’s long-time CEO Ivan Seidenberg retired in August 2011, the company paid him $26.4 million for just eight months of service that year, a 45 percent increase over his haul for 12 months of work the previous year. The company greeted its new CEO Lowell McAdam with a compensation package that totaled $23 million last year. Seidenberg was the highest paid telecom CEO in 2011. McAdam was the second-highest paid that year.

Verizon executives get half their fat bonuses for simply performing better than one-third of the company’s competitors. “In school, that would be a D or an F, said C. William Jones, a former managing director of corporate planning at Verizon about this laughingly low hurdle. “You certainly wouldn’t get a pat on the head for it.”

When the U.S. economy was healthier, corporations had multiple responsibilities. They provided their employees with good jobs, paid taxes that sustained their communities, and offered valued services to customers. Then, as now, they delivered dividends and profits to shareholders. Corporate leaders and managers understood that meeting these obligations were necessary for long-term success. They built their companies to last.

But Verizon and too many other large companies have rapidly moved to a new model, one built on the primacy of shareholder returns above all else. Built-to-last companies have given way to corporations that are built to loot.

The angry citizens who are raising their voices at annual shareholder meetings this spring understand that shifting the American business model back to “built-to-last” mode will require new rules that promote dignified work, fair taxes, and a smaller gap between CEO compensation and workers’ paychecks. Unless we change these rules, built-to-loot companies will be a national wrecking ball.

By Chuck Collins, a Senior Scholar, and Scott Klinger, an Associate Fellow, at the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies. Collins is the author of the new book: 99 to 1: How Wealth Inequality is Wrecking the World and What We Can Do about It.
  Adapted from Shortchanging America, distributed via OtherWords (OtherWords.org).

99% Spring Has Sprung: Shareholder Actions Underway Across the County

99% Spring Has Sprung: Shareholder Actions Underway Across the County

Center for Media and Democracy PR Watch

by Mary Bottari — April 29, 2012 – 7:27am

Read the full article here

The people’s shareholders 

This spring, in coordinated actions across the country, retirees who lost their pensions, families whose homes are underwater, students with impossible debt, the unemployed and underemployed, family farmers, immigrants, vets and more will be knocking on the doors of corporate boardrooms, holding CEOs of major American firms responsible for crashing the economy then turning their backs on their fellow Americans. With hundreds of shareholders on the inside and thousands of folks on the outside, the largest shareholder demonstrations in U.S. history are underway and spreading across the land.

Their goal is nothing short of transformational: to wrest control of our democracy back from the robber barons and CEOs that systematically block any effort to create an economy and a body politic that serves the needs of the vast majority of Americans and not the elite few.

Thousands Surround Wells Fargo and GE

To get things moving, National People’s Action (NPA) director George Goehl and nine other members of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (Iowa CCI) went to a Wells Fargo office in downtown Des Moines with a simple, civilized request. They wanted to ask CEO John Stumpf to give a group of concerned shareholders a single hour of time at the annual shareholders meeting in San Francisco the next day.

Stumpf had no reply. Goehl and nine other peaceful protestors — retirees, vets, and farmers — refused to leave until they got one. All were arrested.

The next day, thousands of humans and one giant inflatable rat surrounded the Wells shareholder meeting in San Francisco. Shareholders had to be escorted in by police, hundreds of shareholders (including 100 clergy from across America) were barred from entry, but a few dozen representatives of the 99% got in. Occupy San Francisco played a major role in the effort and live-streamed the events all day long.

According to Maurice Weeks of the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, the protesters were asking Wells to increase principal forgiveness to aid families underwater or facing foreclosure; pay their fair share of taxes; stop financing payday lenders; stop all political lobbying; and divest stock in GEO Group Inc., a publicly-traded private-prison operation.

Ross Rhodes, 53, of San Francisco clutched his proxy shareholder letter with the hopes he could talk with Stumpf about his struggle to save his family’s home of nearly 50 years from foreclosure, but hundreds were blocked from entering. Larry Ginter, who traveled all the way from Rhodes, Iowa, managed to get inside, but Stumpf would not yield.

Stumpf had the protesters arrested and carted away. Not a single remaining shareholder even squeaked as his $20 million dollar bonus package was approved. An estimated 24 people were arrested inside and outside the building.

The giant rat escaped the cuffs. 

The next day, thousands arrived on the doorstep of General Electric to shine a light on the role GE has played in deepening the economic crisis for many by dodging its tax obligations. Shanie Smith from Chicago’s south side said she was headed to Detroit because “GE is the biggest tax dodger in the United States,” a claim supported by Citizens for Tax Justice data that pegs GE with an effective negative tax rate from 2008 through 2010. Because GE wasn’t paying its taxes, the state of Illinois was short some $200 million in revenue, says Smith, funds that could be used to put people to work or preserve critical public services in tough times.

Hundreds of shareholders on the inside had their say before they were escorted out by police.

Pulling Back the Curtain on Who Controls the Economy

According to Goehl, whose organization has been pounding the Obama administration for meaningful help for families in foreclosure, it’s time to “scale up” to make the fight for a fair economy the mass movement it needs to be to get things done. “Government isn’t the problem — it’s the prize. But right now it rests in the hands of corporations and it sits a trophy case down on Wall Street. We can go to the government and ask elected officials to address these issues or we can ask who is really in charge here? We think the corporations are in charge, so we need to go to the people behind the curtain, the people pulling the strings and tell them ‘if you want to run our economy, if you want to run our democracy, you will need to deal with us directly.’”

Some 32 shareholder actions are planned. Next up: a diverse list of energy firms, banks and baddies like Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Sallie Mae (think student loans), Verizon, Wal-Mart, WellPoint, Occidental, Peabody Coal, and more. These and hundreds of smaller events scheduled for the coming weeks have been in planning for a year. Inspired by the Wisconsin Uprising and Occupy Wall Street actions, organizers have worked hard in an effort dubbed the “99% Spring” to train more than 45,000 people in America’s long tradition of nonviolent direct action.

Trainings took place in church basements, community centers, big cities and small towns across America, and the focus was on direct action role-playing for the many who had never considered walking in Rosa Park’s shoes. “There is no road to a fair economy and true democracy that does not include going toe to toe with abusive corporations,” says Goehl.

Dupes for the Democrats?

But the effort has generated a bit of controversy. While confronting corporate CEOs directly in boardrooms can be empowering for some, for others, a conspiracy lurks.

Anonymous bloggers and others have spent a lot of time detailing the “smoking gun” that the liberal online advocacy organization Move On provided internet support for the recent 99% Spring trainings, and tarred the entire 80 group coalition — which includes small, feisty NGOs as well as major unions and more mainstream groups — as a front group for MoveOn.org and the Democratic Party. The raison d’etre of the spring actions, we are warned, is to “co-opt the Occupy movement and steal it as its own.” The Nation magazine, Bill Moyers, Chris Hayes, and a raft of others are “in on the take.”

The more likely — and less interesting — story is that these journalists had heard a lot about the planning for the shareholder actions over the course of the year and have long admired the work of the groups involved.

Co-optation or Cross-Pollination?

For key groups like NPA and Iowa CCI, the “co-optation” critique is more than a bit ironic. The allied groups are made up of people on the front lines of the financial crisis, people facing foreclosure, immigrants fighting wage theft, and seniors fighting cuts in critical government services. In the early days of the financial crisis, they surrounded Ben Bernanke’s house with hundreds of people, took over an American Bankers Association conference, organized a mass march on Wall Street, shut down K Street, crossed the moat at the JP Morgan Chase shareholder meeting, infiltrated the Mortgage Bankers Convention, and stood shoulder to shoulder with allies in the Occupy movement.

These groups don’t have time for co-optation, but they are definitely interested in cross-pollination.

Rainforest Action Network (RAN) has been a leader in the 99% Spring actions, along with other groups specializing in direct action. RAN has worked well with Occupy forces in many cities on joint projects like “Occupy our Food Supply.” What does RAN have to say about the critique that they are dupes for the Democrats?

RAN spokesperson Nell Greenberg just laughs, “People haven’t done their homework. Our message is about how our democracy has been bought and sold, so I don’t think the Democratic Party is going to pay for that one. In 26 years, RAN has never had any relationship with the Democratic Party. We are all about corporate campaigning.”

The 99% Spring has many defenders in the Occupy movement. “These organizations are encouraging thousands of people to undergo direct action training, without any electioneering diluting that goal, despite the fact that we are six months out from a presidential election,” Occupy the SEC’s Alexis Goldstein told The Nation. “This is unprecedented, amazing, and shows that there is an important focus on trainings and education among groups that may have different strategies.”

Sam Corbin has worked with Occupy since before it took Zucotti Park. She has also worked hard to make 99% Spring a success. As a trainer for the legendary Ruckus Society, her objective was to help people who were pissed off and fired up “access their own power and get involved in direct action.” According to Sam, “a lot of Occupy folks facilitated spring trainings or were trained themselves.” She found the trainings exciting because “people living in the same community got out of their silos and met each other for the first time.” Because invitations went out from a broad array of groups, the result was “incredibly diverse groups of people eager to be trained” — diverse racially, economically and age-wise. She thinks all the kibitzing “is irrelevant compared to thousands of people taking action.”

In the trainings this reporter participated in, not a word was said about Barack Obama or Nancy Pelosi, but a lot was said about the corporate capture of our democracy. An incredibly diverse crowd was inspired by a film showing many direct action triumphs through U.S. history, including the grape boycotts and farm worker marches of the 80′s, the anti-globalization protests of the 90′s, and the recent actions stopping the Keystone XL pipeline.

Long-time corporate campaigner John Sellers of “The Other 98%,” who famously was held for $1 million in bail at the 2000 Republican National Convention, participated in many of the actions featured in the movie. He says the criticism of main stream groups like Move On is misplaced: “If we really want to be the 99%, we are going to need soccer moms out on the street taking action.” From his perspective, “the fact that all these giant mainstream groups are now talking about how our democracy has been stolen from us is an incredible opportunity, not a problem.” One wonders if there would be any controversy if it had been called the 98% Spring.

“Another World is Possible”

There are literally hundreds of grassroots anti-corporate actions planned for the spring, including General Strikes and May Day actions being planned by Occupy groups across the nation.

For those of us involved in the protests that brought the WTO to its knees in 1999 and stymied its expansion since, we are seeing something familiar and hopeful — a remarkable convergence of diverse groups, who are borrowing language, tactics, strategies, targets, and inspiration from each other. The fact that labor and more main-stream groups are willing to learn something from today’s young activists, shows that we have come a long way since Seattle.

Echoing through the urban canyons in San Francisco is a hopeful chant building on the “Another World is Possible” theme of the WTO protesters: “We are unstoppable, another world is possible.”

General Electric: Bringing Inequality to Life Through Tax Dodging

General Electric: Bringing Inequality to Life Through Tax Dodging

Perhaps more than any other company, General Electric has turned tax avoidance into an art form. The company’s 975 person tax department annually produces a tax return of more than 50,000 pages. It takes that many pages to fill out the forms for all the special tax breaks GE’s lobbyists have won.

Over the last ten years, General Electric reported $81 billion in U.S. profits and yet paid just $1.8 billion in federal corporate income taxes, an effective tax rate of just 2.3%, according to Citizens for Tax Justice.

General Electric has used its political clout to place its CEO, Jeffrey Immelt, as Chair of the President’s Jobs and Competitiveness Council, where he has direct access to President Obama. It is an odd job for a man who presides over one of the country’s biggest job destroyers. In 2004, the company got a tax holiday on $1.2 billion of foreign income, thanks to a law that promised tax breaks for companies that brought money home and created jobs. Instead, between 2004 and 2010, General Electric slashed 32,000 jobs.

That came on top of GE’s massive offshoring drive in the 1980s and 1990s, when it cut its U.S. workforce nearly in half. Former CEO Jack Welch was so committed to seeking the lowest cost workers that he once famously said “ideally, you’d have every plant you own on a barge.” In 2011, General Electric added back about 10,000 U.S. workers, but not nearly enough to make up for their decades of job-slashing.

General Electric was one of 30 companies highlighted for paying more to lobby Congress than they paid in federal taxes between 2008-10. GE topped the list of 30 in two categories: money spent on lobbying ($84 million) and size of their IRS refund (GE got back $4.7 billion even though they reported more than $10 billion in U.S. profits).  General Electric has fought long and hard for one of its most lucrative tax breaks, the active financing exception, which saves the company up to $100 million on taxes each year. The “exception,” first passed in 1997, has been renewed by Congress multiple times.

If tax dodging and job cutting were Olympic sports, GE would be a champion.

Scott Klinger is an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies.

 

 

Bank CEOs gain as millions lose dreams, retirement to foreclosure

Bank CEOs gain as millions lose dreams, retirement to foreclosure

In the Star Ledger April 25, 2012

By Scott Klinger and John Cavanagh

Inside and outside of Wells Fargo’s annual meeting in San Francisco yesterday, thousands of angry protesters decried the bank’s leading role in the loss of millions of American homes to foreclosure.

If you want to know why the protesters are so angry, consider this double standard. For most Americans, retirement security lies in the value of their homes. Millions of these people have been losing that security as the nation’s largest banks have foreclosed on them. Yet the CEOs of these banks are reaping giant pay packages and padding their own retirement security with profits squeezed from ordinary people.

For many American families, a paid-off home is part of the dream of a secure retirement. The roof over their heads has long comprised the largest element of most families’ net worth. The housing crisis brought to us by the country’s biggest bankers has stolen the dreams of the nearly 4 million families who have lost their homes to foreclosure since the housing crisis began in 2007.

Of those who continue to live in their homes, more than a quarter have lost so much equity that they now owe more on their mortgage than their residence is worth. Even those who have never missed a payment on these underwater mortgages have found it all but impossible to refinance their loans to take advantage of record low rates that would cut hundreds of dollars from their monthly payments.

As American families struggle with their shrinking equity, Wells Fargo is enjoying record profits. Its earnings clocked in at more than $4 billion during the first quarter of 2012.

Wells Fargo and Bank of America are the country’s two largest mortgage servicers. Over the past three years, the number of homes foreclosed upon by the two giant banks has steadily grown. At the end of 2011, they reported to federal banking regulators that they held $22.5 billion and $19 billion worth of foreclosed houses, respectively.

While foreclosures have devastated the financial security of millions of American families, the CEOs of Wells Fargo and Bank of America have seen their retirement packages balloon.

The pension assets of Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf stand at $16 million, according to the company’s proxy statement. The vast majority of these assets came from a special plan available only to the company’s top executives. As high as Stumpf’s retirement assets have soared, they’re exceeded by those of another Wells Fargo executive. Mark Oman oversees the company’s consumer lending division, where most of its ill-fated subprime loans were made and where many customers have lost their homes to foreclosure. His retirement assets top $17 million.

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan’s pension assets now total $6.8 million. His nest egg came mainly from a special “supplemental” pension plan.

It’s long past time that banking regulators stopped these dream-stealers from laughing their way to their gold-plated retirements. Protesters are insisting that the corporate funds diverted to prop up the lavish lifestyles of those responsible for upending the lives of the millions of American families who have lost their homes be redirected toward principal relief for homeowners devastated by these banks’ actions.

The Wells Fargo action was just the start. Don’t be surprised when thousands more protesters show up when Bank of America shareholders gather on May 9 in Charlotte, N.C.

Scott Klinger is an associate fellow and John Cavanagh is the director of the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies (ips-dc.org). This article was distributed by OtherWords. For more like this one, visit OtherWords.org.

Read the article on NJ.Com